On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 03:27:32PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 03:19:13PM CET, simon.hor...@netronome.com wrote:
> >On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 04:28:10PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >> Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 11:37:34AM CET, simon.hor...@netronome.com wrote:
> >> >Allow dissection of Neighbour Discovery target IP, and source and
> >> >destination link-layer addresses for neighbour solicitation and
> >> >advertisement messages.
> >> >
> >> >Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <simon.hor...@netronome.com>
> >> >---
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> >@@ -633,6 +702,18 @@ bool __skb_flow_dissect(const struct sk_buff *skb,
> >> > FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ICMP,
> >> > target_container);
> >> > key_icmp->icmp = skb_flow_get_be16(skb, nhoff, data, hlen);
> >> >+
> >> >+ if (dissector_uses_key(flow_dissector, FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ND) &&
> >> >+ ip_proto == IPPROTO_IPV6 && key_icmp->code == 0 &&
> >>
> >> IPPROTO_IPV6 say "IPv6-in-IPv4 tunnelling". Please use "NEXTHDR_IPV6"
> >> instead.
> >
> >Thanks, will do.
> >
> >> >+ (key_icmp->type == NDISC_NEIGHBOUR_SOLICITATION ||
> >> >+ key_icmp->type == NDISC_NEIGHBOUR_ADVERTISEMENT)) {
> >> >+ key_nd = skb_flow_dissector_target(flow_dissector,
> >> >+
> >> >FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ND,
> >> >+ target_container);
> >> >+ if (!(skb_flow_dissect_nd(skb, key_nd, data, nhoff,
> >> >+ hlen, ipv6_payload_len)))
> >> >+ goto out_bad;
> >> >+ }
> >>
> >> You should put this under "switch (ip_proto) {"
> >
> >I see that makes sense in terms of the check against ip_proto.
> >But I added it here to allow checking against key_icmp->code
> >and key_icmp->type as well.
>
> Sure. Just add under "switch (ip_proto) {" and call a wrapper nd
> function from there. In that function, you check dissector_uses_key and
> other needed things.
Sorry, but I'm still a little unclear on how that interacts with
the dissection of key_icmp.
