On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > So unless I'm mistaken I don't see any problem using "depends on > PTP_1588_CLOCK" here.
Furthermore that wouldn't be a first. See for example PTP_1588_CLOCK_GIANFAR, PTP_1588_CLOCK_IXP46X, DP83640_PHY, etc. Nicolas
