On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 01:42:44PM +0100, Andreas Schultz wrote: > > It is definitely not acceptable to break the existing API. > > The specific use case of the API that is no longer supported was never used by > anyone. [...]
Yes, this was used openggsn and I tested this with a full blown FOSS setup. Yes, a toy thing compared to the proprietary equipment you deal with, but we always started with things like this. > The only supported and documented API for the GTP module is libgtpnl. No, the netlink interface itself if the API. Stopping trying to find a reason to break API, that is a no-go.
