On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Neal Cardwell <ncardw...@google.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 8:45 PM, <f...@ikuai8.com> wrote: >> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c >> index 1e319a5..4f7f163 100644 >> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c >> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c >> @@ -2470,7 +2470,7 @@ static int do_tcp_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int >> level, >> /* Values greater than interface MTU won't take effect. >> However >> * at the point when this call is done we typically don't yet >> * know which interface is going to be used */ >> - if (val < TCP_MIN_MSS || val > MAX_TCP_WINDOW) { >> + if (!val && (val < TCP_MIN_MSS || val > MAX_TCP_WINDOW)) { >> err = -EINVAL; >> break; > > I believe the sense of the val check is flipped in the proposed patch. > > I believe Eric suggested: > > if (val && (val < TCP_MIN_MSS || val > MAX_TCP_WINDOW)) { > > Has this been tested? > > neal
Sorry, I missed the test this time because of the minor fix. As a result, wrote the wrong logic. Regards Feng