In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Fri, 7 Jul 2006 11:54:25 +0400), Andrey
Savochkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 01:34:34PM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [EMAIL
> PROTECTED](B wrote:
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 3 Jul 2006 12:18:51 +0400), Andrey
> > Savochkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> >
> > > @@ -3271,22 +3277,22 @@ int unregister_netdevice(struct net_devi
> > >
> > > /* And unlink it from device chain. */
> > > for (dp = &dev_base; (d = *dp) != NULL; dp = &d->next) {
> >
> > Why not for_each_netdev?
>
> it's a different list
Sorry, I still do not understand.
In other words, why will we still have dev->next?
After introducing net_device->dev_list, we do not need
dev->next anymore, do we?
--yoshfuji
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
