On Tuesday 2017-03-28 15:13, simran singhal wrote:

>Some functions like kmalloc/kzalloc return NULL on failure. When NULL
>represents failure, !x is commonly used.
>
>@@ -910,7 +910,7 @@ ip_vs_new_dest(struct ip_vs_service *svc, struct 
>ip_vs_dest_user_kern *udest,
>       }
> 
>       dest = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ip_vs_dest), GFP_KERNEL);
>-      if (dest == NULL)
>+      if (!dest)
>               return -ENOMEM;

This kind of transformation however is not cleanup anymore, it's really 
bikeshedding and should be avoided. There are pro and cons for both 
variants, and there is not really an overwhelming number of arguments 
for either variant to justify the change.

Reply via email to