On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 03:22:28PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> This patch makes tun_recvmsg() can receive from skb from its caller
> through msg_control. Vhost_net will be the first user.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com>

Do we need to bother with tun? I didn't realize one
can even use that with vhost. What would be the point of
all the virtio header stuff dealing with checksums etc?

Even if you see a use-case is it worth optimizing?


> ---
>  drivers/net/tun.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> index 70dd9ec..a82bced 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> @@ -1498,9 +1498,8 @@ static struct sk_buff *tun_ring_recv(struct tun_file 
> *tfile, int noblock,
>  
>  static ssize_t tun_do_read(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_file *tfile,
>                          struct iov_iter *to,
> -                        int noblock)
> +                        int noblock, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  {
> -     struct sk_buff *skb;
>       ssize_t ret;
>       int err;
>  
> @@ -1509,10 +1508,12 @@ static ssize_t tun_do_read(struct tun_struct *tun, 
> struct tun_file *tfile,
>       if (!iov_iter_count(to))
>               return 0;
>  
> -     /* Read frames from ring */
> -     skb = tun_ring_recv(tfile, noblock, &err);
> -     if (!skb)
> -             return err;
> +     if (!skb) {
> +             /* Read frames from ring */
> +             skb = tun_ring_recv(tfile, noblock, &err);
> +             if (!skb)
> +                     return err;
> +     }
>  
>       ret = tun_put_user(tun, tfile, skb, to);
>       if (unlikely(ret < 0))
> @@ -1532,7 +1533,7 @@ static ssize_t tun_chr_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, 
> struct iov_iter *to)
>  
>       if (!tun)
>               return -EBADFD;
> -     ret = tun_do_read(tun, tfile, to, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK);
> +     ret = tun_do_read(tun, tfile, to, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK, NULL);
>       ret = min_t(ssize_t, ret, len);
>       if (ret > 0)
>               iocb->ki_pos = ret;
> @@ -1634,7 +1635,8 @@ static int tun_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct 
> msghdr *m, size_t total_len,
>                                        SOL_PACKET, TUN_TX_TIMESTAMP);
>               goto out;
>       }
> -     ret = tun_do_read(tun, tfile, &m->msg_iter, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
> +     ret = tun_do_read(tun, tfile, &m->msg_iter, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT,
> +                       m->msg_control);
>       if (ret > (ssize_t)total_len) {
>               m->msg_flags |= MSG_TRUNC;
>               ret = flags & MSG_TRUNC ? ret : total_len;
> -- 
> 2.7.4

Reply via email to