[PATCH net-next] sock: correctly test SOCK_TIMESTAMP in sock_recv_ts_and_drops()

[Eric Dumazet]

From: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>

It seems the code does not match the intent.

This broke packetdrill, and probably other programs.

Fixes: 6c7c98bad488 ("sock: avoid dirtying sk_stamp, if possible")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pab...@redhat.com>
---
 include/net/sock.h |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index 
8e53158a7d957ea2a480cc449606dca2480b1259..66349e49d468646ce724485bb8e74952825f0d6c
 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -2250,7 +2250,7 @@ static inline void sock_recv_ts_and_drops(struct msghdr 
*msg, struct sock *sk,
 
        if (sk->sk_flags & FLAGS_TS_OR_DROPS || sk->sk_tsflags & TSFLAGS_ANY)
                __sock_recv_ts_and_drops(msg, sk, skb);
-       else if (unlikely(sk->sk_flags & SOCK_TIMESTAMP))
+       else if (unlikely(sock_flag(sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMP)))
                sk->sk_stamp = skb->tstamp;
        else if (unlikely(sk->sk_stamp == SK_DEFAULT_STAMP))
                sk->sk_stamp = 0;