From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:35:51 +0200
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 07:14:05AM -0700, David Miller wrote: >> >> For net-next: >> > >> > I noticed this is marked as "Not Applicable" in patchwork: >> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/747723/ >> > >> > But I'm not quite sure why. Maybe you meant to mark only v1? >> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/747674/ >> >> If the last patch of his series removes a kernel global API, >> it shouldn't go via my tree. He can send it directly to Linus >> or via the PCI maintainer. > > This is a single patch that does not remove anything. > > For the different series I explicitly asked if it's okay if the whole > thing goes in through the net tree and Bjorn was fine it. If you're > not it would be nice if you could state that in the series so that > the submitter can act on it. My bad I thought this was part of that series. Could you do me a favor and repost that series, with this mlxsw patch added to it. I will apply it to net-next. Thanks!
