On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Keller, Jacob E <jacob.e.kel...@intel.com> wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Miroslav Lichvar [mailto:mlich...@redhat.com] >> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 8:00 AM >> >> Oh, I see. I was struggling to find a good name for this option. >> >> > The name for this option is therefore not very descriptive. Perhaps >> > SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_BOTH_SW_HW. >> >> Simultaneous SW/HW timestamping was already possible for incoming >> packets. Maybe _OPT_TX_SWHW would be better? >> > > This sounds more accurate to me.
Agreed.
