On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com> wrote:
> On 2017-04-24 23:27, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com> wrote:
>>> The IOT2000 is industrial controller platform, derived from the Intel
>>> Galileo Gen2 board. The variant IOT2020 comes with one LAN port, the
>>> IOT2040 has two of them. They can be told apart based on the board asset
>>> tag in the DMI table.

>>> +       const char *asset_tag;
>>
>> I guess this is redundant. See below.
>>
>>> +       {
>>> +               .name = "SIMATIC IOT2000",
>>> +               .asset_tag = "6ES7647-0AA00-0YA2",
>>> +               .func = 6,
>>> +               .phy_addr = 1,
>>> +       },
>>
>> The below has same definition disregard on asset_tag.
>>
>
> There is a small difference in the asset tag, just not at the last digit
> where one may expect it, look:
>
> ...-0YA2 -> IOT2020
> ...-1YA2 -> IOT2040

Yes. And how does it change my statement? You may use one record here
instead of two.

>
>>> +       {
>>> +               .name = "SIMATIC IOT2000",
>>> +               .asset_tag = "6ES7647-0AA00-1YA2",
>>> +               .func = 6,
>>> +               .phy_addr = 1,
>>> +       },

>>> +       {
>>> +               .name = "SIMATIC IOT2000",
>>> +               .asset_tag = "6ES7647-0AA00-1YA2",
>>> +               .func = 7,
>>> +               .phy_addr = 1,
>>> +       },
>>
>> How this supposed to work if phy_addr is the same?
> That address space is MAC-local, and we have two different MACs here.

Got it, though asset_tag here is redundant as well.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Reply via email to