On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 10:21:11PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>On Wed, 3 May 2017 14:44:35 +1000
>Gavin Shan <gws...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> +void ncsi_ethtool_register_dev(struct net_device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct ethtool_ops *ops;
>> +
>> + ops = (struct ethtool_ops *)(dev->ethtool_ops);
>> + if (!ops)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + ops->get_ncsi_channels = ncsi_get_channels;
>> +}
>> +
>
>Instead of casting away const which opens up potential security
>issues. Have two ethtool_ops structures.
>
Thanks for the comments, Stephen. Yeah, It should be corrected
as Andrew already suggested.
Cheers,
Gavin
