On 05/23/2017 06:04 PM, Mintz, Yuval wrote:
>>>> Patches 6-8 add the "ethtool -f" and the boot-time firmware upgrade on
>> the
>>>> mlxsw spectrum driver.
>>> When we tried using `ethtool -E' for qed we got burned for trying to use
>> the magic
>>> value [1]. When we suggested extending it to allow some private data
>> indications,
>>> Ben claimed that this entire ethtool infrastructure is a thing of the past,
>>> and we should try using MTD instead - a claim no one bothered to counter.
>>>
>>> Creating proprietary file-formats, filling them with metadata and
>>> complementary driver state-machines could easily overcome the original
>>> obstacle we faced. But it raises the question of whether these APIs are
>>> valid or obsolete.
>> The metadata in our format is needed to allow us to hold several firmware
>> images for several spectrum silicon variants in one file, hence the metadata
>> is used by the driver and does not get transferred to the device.
> Understood; Otherwise it would have been 'data' and not 'metadata'.
>
>> Our code can only be used to transfer firmware to the device, and cannot
>> be used to configure the device.
> Not sure what this refers to? The differences between '-f' and '-E'?
> Also, assuming you haven't started selling your adapters as persistent memory
> for storage, what's the difference?
>

Sorry, I am not sure I understand. You think that drivers should not implement
ethtool's flash_device callback anymore? do you have an alternative for firmware
flash?

Reply via email to