On 2017-05-27 15:28, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com> wrote:
>> Avoids reimplementation of DMI matching in stmmac_pci_find_phy_addr.
> 
>>  struct stmmac_pci_dmi_data {
>> -       const char *name;
>> -       const char *asset_tag;
>> -       unsigned int func;
>> +       int func;
>>         int phy_addr;
>>  };
> 
> Can we leave unsigned type here...
> 
>> -static struct stmmac_pci_dmi_data quark_pci_dmi_data[] = {
>> +static const struct stmmac_pci_dmi_data galileo_stmmac_dmi_data[] = {
> 
>> +       {-1, -1},
>> +};
> 
>> +static const struct stmmac_pci_dmi_data iot2040_stmmac_dmi_data[] = {
> 
>> +       {-1, -1},
>> +};
> 
> ...and avoid this not so standard terminators?

0 is a valid PCI function, thus can't be use as terminator. Therefore I
chose -1 as an obviously invalid value.

> 
>> +               .matches = {
>> +                       DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "GalileoGen2"),
>> +               },
> 
>> +               .driver_data = (void *)galileo_stmmac_dmi_data,
> 
> Can't be slightly better
> 
>              .driver_data = &galileo_stmmac_dmi_data,
> 
> ?
> 

Interesting, that removes the "const" as well. OK.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA ITP SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

Reply via email to