From: Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 00:45:43 +0200
> >From a pure eye-candy perspective it would be nice to use same format > all over. > >From Documentation/SubmittingPatches: > ------------------ > 12) The canonical patch format > > The canonical patch subject line is: > > Subject: [PATCH 001/123] subsystem: summary phrase > -------------- The patch format specifies things that make no sense when the changes gets into the tree. Especially the sequence numbers, which are implied by the changes placement in the relative changeset history. We are getting into the realm of personal taste, and I fail to see any benefit from enforcing one subsystem to adopt a different schema if what they're doing now provides all the necessary information and works well for them. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
