There is no agreed-upon definition of spin_unlock_wait()'s semantics,
and it appears that all callers could do just as well with a lock/unlock
pair. This commit therefore eliminates the spin_unlock_wait() call and
associated else-clause and hoists the then-clause's lock and unlock out of
the "if" statement. This should be safe from a performance perspective
because according to Tejun there should be few if any drivers that don't
set their own error handler.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-...@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <st...@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Andrea Parri <parri.and...@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
---
drivers/ata/libata-eh.c | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
index ef68232b5222..779f6f18c1f4 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
@@ -645,12 +645,11 @@ void ata_scsi_cmd_error_handler(struct Scsi_Host *host,
struct ata_port *ap,
* completions are honored. A scmd is determined to have
* timed out iff its associated qc is active and not failed.
*/
+ spin_lock_irqsave(ap->lock, flags);
if (ap->ops->error_handler) {
struct scsi_cmnd *scmd, *tmp;
int nr_timedout = 0;
- spin_lock_irqsave(ap->lock, flags);
-
/* This must occur under the ap->lock as we don't want
a polled recovery to race the real interrupt handler
@@ -700,12 +699,11 @@ void ata_scsi_cmd_error_handler(struct Scsi_Host *host,
struct ata_port *ap,
if (nr_timedout)
__ata_port_freeze(ap);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(ap->lock, flags);
/* initialize eh_tries */
ap->eh_tries = ATA_EH_MAX_TRIES;
- } else
- spin_unlock_wait(ap->lock);
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(ap->lock, flags);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(ata_scsi_cmd_error_handler);
--
2.5.2
