On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 16:50 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > +static int mtk_clk_enable(struct mtk_eth *eth)
> > +{
> > +   int clk, ret;
> > +
> > +   for (clk = 0; clk < MTK_CLK_MAX ; clk++) {
> > +           if (eth->clks[clk]) {
> > +                   ret = clk_prepare_enable(eth->clks[clk]);
> > +                   if (ret)
> > +                           goto err_disable_clks;
> > +           }
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   return 0;
> > +
> > +err_disable_clks:
> > +   while (--clk >= 0) {
> > +           if (eth->clks[clk])
> > +                   clk_disable_unprepare(eth->clks[clk]);
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   return ret;
> > +}
> 
> > +
> >  static int mtk_hw_init(struct mtk_eth *eth)
> >  {
> >     int i, val;
> > @@ -1847,10 +1881,8 @@ static int mtk_hw_init(struct mtk_eth *eth)
> >     pm_runtime_enable(eth->dev);
> >     pm_runtime_get_sync(eth->dev);
> >  
> > -   clk_prepare_enable(eth->clks[MTK_CLK_ETHIF]);
> > -   clk_prepare_enable(eth->clks[MTK_CLK_ESW]);
> > -   clk_prepare_enable(eth->clks[MTK_CLK_GP1]);
> > -   clk_prepare_enable(eth->clks[MTK_CLK_GP2]);
> > +   mtk_clk_enable(eth);
> > +
> 
> mtk_clk_enable() returns an error code. It is probably a good idea to
> use it, especially if it could be EPRODE_DEFER.

okay, I will improve those clocks handling better along with Florian's
suggestion in the next version

        Sean












> 
>     Andrew


Reply via email to