That is fine to me. I have tested it. Thanks.
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Willem de Bruijn
<willemdebruijn.ker...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The openvswitch kernel module calls the __skb_gso_segment()(and sets
>> tx_path = false) when passing packets to userspace. The UFO will set
>> the ip_summed to CHECKSUM_NONE. There are a lot of warn logs. The warn
>> log is shown as below. I guess we should revert the patch.
>
> Indeed, the software UFO code computes the checksum and
> sets ip_summed to CHECKSUM_NONE, as is correct on the
> egress path.
>
> Commit 6e7bc478c9a0 ("net: skb_needs_check() accepts
> CHECKSUM_NONE for tx") revised the tx_path case in
> skb_needs_check to avoid the warning exactly for the UFO case.
>
> We cannot just make an exception for CHECKSUM_NONE in the
> !tx_path case, as the entire statement then becomes false:
>
> return skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_NONE;
>
> Since on egress CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY is equivalent to
> CHECKSUM_NONE, it should be fine to update the UFO code
> to set that, instead:
>
> @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *udp4_ufo_fragment(struct
> sk_buff *skb,
> if (uh->check == 0)
> uh->check = CSUM_MANGLED_0;
>
> - skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
> + skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
