On Wed,  9 Aug 2017 08:43:27 -0700
David Ahern <dsah...@gmail.com> wrote:

> In time, errfn can be implemented for link, route, etc commands to
> give a much more detailed response (e.g., point to the attribute
> that failed). Doing so is much more complicated to process the
> message and convert attribute ids to names.
> In any case the error string returned by the kernel should be dumped
> to the user, so make that happen now.
> Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsah...@gmail.com>


Reply via email to