On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 08:43:27 -0700 David Ahern <dsah...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In time, errfn can be implemented for link, route, etc commands to > give a much more detailed response (e.g., point to the attribute > that failed). Doing so is much more complicated to process the > message and convert attribute ids to names. > > In any case the error string returned by the kernel should be dumped > to the user, so make that happen now. > > Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsah...@gmail.com> Applied
