David Ahern <dsah...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/9/17 6:21 PM, David Miller wrote:
> > Ok series applied, let's see where this goes :-)
> 1 hour in, 1 problem reported
Its even worse. Would you rather see a revert?
I'm sure that you are aware that the widespread rtnl usage is a
problem because it does hurt scalability. I still think its worth trying
to disentangle this where possible.
I should have fixes for the reported fallout soon.
Alternatively, I can send a revert plus patch to add ASSERT_RTNL in
one more spot.