On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 11:11:57 +0200 Paweł Staszewski <pstaszew...@itcare.pl> 
wrote:

> Yes it helped - now there is almost no difference when using vlans or not:
> 
> 10.5Mpps - with vlan
> 
> 11Mpps - without vlan

Great! - it seems like we have pinpointed the root-cause.  It also
demonstrate how big the benefit is of Eric commit (thanks!):
 https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/93f154b594fe


> W dniu 2017-08-15 o 03:17, Eric Dumazet pisze:
> > On Mon, 2017-08-14 at 18:07 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >  
> >> Or try to hack the IFF_XMIT_DST_RELEASE flag on the vlan netdev.  
> > Something like :
> >
> > diff --git a/net/8021q/vlan_netlink.c b/net/8021q/vlan_netlink.c
> > index 
> > 5e831de3103e2f7092c7fa15534def403bc62fb4..9472de846d5c0960996261cb2843032847fa4bf7
> >  100644
> > --- a/net/8021q/vlan_netlink.c
> > +++ b/net/8021q/vlan_netlink.c
> > @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ static int vlan_newlink(struct net *src_net, struct 
> > net_device *dev,
> >     vlan->vlan_proto = proto;
> >     vlan->vlan_id    = nla_get_u16(data[IFLA_VLAN_ID]);
> >     vlan->real_dev   = real_dev;
> > +   dev->priv_flags |= (real_dev->priv_flags & IFF_XMIT_DST_RELEASE);
> >     vlan->flags      = VLAN_FLAG_REORDER_HDR;
> >   
> >     err = vlan_check_real_dev(real_dev, vlan->vlan_proto, vlan->vlan_id);

-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer

Reply via email to