* Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2006-08-08 21:33
> +struct sk_buff *__netdev_alloc_skb(struct net_device *dev,
> + unsigned length, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> +{
> + struct sk_buff *skb;
> +
> + if (dev && (dev->flags & IFF_MEMALLOC)) {
> + WARN_ON(gfp_mask & (__GFP_NOMEMALLOC | __GFP_MEMALLOC));
> + gfp_mask &= ~(__GFP_NOMEMALLOC | __GFP_MEMALLOC);
> +
> + if ((skb = ___netdev_alloc_skb(dev, length,
> + gfp_mask | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC)))
> + goto done;
> + if (dev_reserve_used(dev) >= dev->rx_reserve)
> + goto out;
> + if (!(skb = ___netdev_alloc_skb(dev, length,
> + gfp_mask | __GFP_MEMALLOC)))
> + goto out;
> + atomic_inc(&dev->rx_reserve_used);
> + } else
> + if (!(skb = ___netdev_alloc_skb(dev, length, gfp_mask)))
> + goto out;
> +
> +done:
> + skb->dev = dev;
> +out:
> + return skb;
> +}
> +
> void __kfree_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> + struct net_device *dev = skb->dev;
> +
> dst_release(skb->dst);
> #ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
> secpath_put(skb->sp);
> @@ -389,6 +480,8 @@ void __kfree_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
> #endif
>
> kfree_skbmem(skb);
> + if (dev && (dev->flags & IFF_MEMALLOC))
> + dev_unreserve_skb(dev);
> }
skb->dev is not guaranteed to still point to the "allocating" device
once the skb is freed again so reserve/unreserve isn't symmetric.
You'd need skb->alloc_dev or something.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
