On Mon, 2017-08-21 at 20:40 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2017年08月21日 11:06, Jason Wang wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2017年08月19日 14:41, Koichiro Den wrote:
> > > To depend on vq.num and the usage of VHOST_MAX_PEND is not succinct
> > > and in some case unexpected, so revert its logic part only.
> >
> > Hi:
> >
> > Could you explain a little bit more on the case that is was not
> > sufficent?
> >
> > Thanks
>
> Just have another thought.
>
> I wonder whether or not just use ulimit(memlock) is better here. It
> looks more flexible.
>
> Thanks
It sounds a better approach, though at present I have got no idea how much
portion it should be.
