On 09/08/2017 07:06 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 00:14:51 +0200
Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net> wrote:
+ /* This is really only caused by a deliberately crappy
+ * BPF program, normally we would never hit that case,
+ * so no need to inform someone via tracepoints either,
+ * just bail out.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(map_owner != xdp_prog))
+ return -EINVAL;
IMHO we do need to call the tracepoint here. It is not just crappy
BPF-progs that cause this situation, it is also drivers not implementing
XDP_REDIRECT yet (which is all but ixgbe). Due to the level XDP
operates at, tracepoints are the only way users can runtime troubleshoot
their XDP programs.
Drivers not implementing XDP_REDIRECT don't even get there in
the first place. What they will do is to hit the 'default' case
when they check for the action code from the BPF program. Then
call into bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action(act), and fall-through
to hit the tracepoint at trace_xdp_exception() which is also
triggered by XDP_ABORTED usually. So when that happens we do
complain loudly and call a tracepoint already. We should probably
tweak the bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action() message a little to make
it clear that the action could also just be unsupported by the
driver instead of being illegal.
