Hi David,

David Laight <david.lai...@aculab.com> writes:

[...]

>> > index 099bf5528fed..41e349df4bf4 100644
>> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/pkt_sched.h
>> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/pkt_sched.h
>> > @@ -871,4 +871,22 @@ struct tc_pie_xstats {
>> >    __u32 maxq;             /* maximum queue size */
>> >    __u32 ecn_mark;         /* packets marked with ecn*/
>> >  };
>> > +
>> > +/* CBS */
>> > +struct tc_cbs_qopt {
>> > +  __u8 offload;
>
> You probably don't want unnamed padding in a uapi structure.

Yeah, this needs to be fixed.

>
>> > +  __s32 hicredit;
>> > +  __s32 locredit;
>> > +  __s32 idleslope;
>> > +  __s32 sendslope;
>> > +};
>> > +
>> > +enum {
>> > +  TCA_CBS_UNSPEC,
>> > +  TCA_CBS_PARMS,
>> > +  __TCA_CBS_MAX,
>> > +};
>> > +
>> > +#define TCA_CBS_MAX (__TCA_CBS_MAX - 1)
>
> Why not:
>       TCA_CBS_PARMS,
>       TCA_CBS_NEXT,
>       TCA_CBS_MAX = TCA_CBS_NEXT - 1,

The way it is proposed, at least is consistent with the rest of the
file. So, if you don't have any stronger reasons, I'd like to keep it
this way.

>
> ...
>       David


Cheers,
--
Vinicius

Reply via email to