Hi Markus,

this discussion went far beyond the original posted patch for vxcan.c

I would suggest you post your idea of the simplified error handling flow in vxcan.c just on linux-can ML (which is the right mailing list for CAN related stuff).

Thanks,
Oliver

On 10/28/2017 10:13 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
Are you interested in related adjustments for a bigger code base?

No. Definitely not.

You might have noticed that I am proposing similar changes already
for other software modules.   ;-)


If you aim for the the deletion of “ < 0” for all rtnl_configure_link() users
you would need to do this consistently.

How do you see the software situation around a function
like “register_netdevice”?

Regards,
Markus

Reply via email to