Jarod Wilson <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
>On 2017-11-02 9:11 PM, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
[...]
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>> b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>> index 18b58e1376f1..6f89f9981a6c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>> @@ -2046,6 +2046,7 @@ static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bonding *bond)
>> bond_for_each_slave_rcu(bond, slave, iter) {
>> slave->new_link = BOND_LINK_NOCHANGE;
>> + slave->link_new_state = slave->link;
>> link_state = bond_check_dev_link(bond, slave->dev, 0);
>>
>>
>> Alex / Jarod, could you check my logic, and would you be able to
>> test this patch if my analysis appears sound?
>
>This patch looks good, the original reproducing setup successfully
>recovers after the original active slave goes down, even with
>NetworkManager in the mix.
>
>Reviewed-by: Jarod Wilson <ja...@redhat.com>
Thanks, I'll get a formal patch submission out later today.
-J
---
-Jay Vosburgh, jay.vosbu...@canonical.com
