On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 05:08:40PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 13:33:06 -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > + ret = idr_alloc_u32(&head->handle_idr, prog, &handle,
> > + INT_MAX, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + } else if (!oldprog) {
> > + ret = idr_alloc_u32(&head->handle_idr, prog, &handle,
> > + handle, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> nit: in many places you seem to not align the second line with opening
> parenthesis. Is that intentional?
It's more that I don't care. I press 'enter', which indents the arguments
by a certain amount, then press the 'tab' key until it looks aesthetically
pleasing.
> FWIW there may be a small merge conflict with net on cls_bpf in patch
> 5, some of the code has been removed.
Thanks. Dave, do you want to take the IDR patches through your tree to
save conflict resolution?
