Oops, sorry. Please drop this.
This patch is wrong and I will submit a correct one, soon.
a 0x900 core does not exist. Instead the meaning of the
revision bits changed slightly.
On Saturday 26 August 2006 12:33, Michael Buesch wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Please apply this to wireless-dev.
>
> --
>
> This adds support for the new 0x900 ChipCommon core.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Index: wireless-dev/drivers/misc/ssb.c
> ===================================================================
> --- wireless-dev.orig/drivers/misc/ssb.c 2006-08-24 22:33:44.000000000
> +0200
> +++ wireless-dev/drivers/misc/ssb.c 2006-08-26 12:28:31.000000000 +0200
> @@ -648,7 +648,7 @@
>
> ssb->chipcommon_capabilities = 0;
> ssb->nr_cores = 0;
> - if (cc == SSB_CC_CHIPCOMMON) {
> + if (cc == SSB_CC_CHIPCOMMON || cc == SSB_CC_CHIPCOMMON2) {
> tmp = ssb_read32(ssb, SSB_CHIPCOMMON_CHIPID);
>
> ssb->chip_id = (tmp & SSB_CHIPCOMMON_IDMASK);
> @@ -656,7 +656,7 @@
> SSB_CHIPCOMMON_REVSHIFT;
> ssb->chip_package = (tmp & SSB_CHIPCOMMON_PACKMASK) >>
> SSB_CHIPCOMMON_PACKSHIFT;
> - if (rev >= 4) {
> + if (rev >= 4 || cc == SSB_CC_CHIPCOMMON2) {
> ssb->nr_cores = (tmp & SSB_CHIPCOMMON_NRCORESMASK) >>
> SSB_CHIPCOMMON_NRCORESSHIFT;
> }
> Index: wireless-dev/include/linux/ssb.h
> ===================================================================
> --- wireless-dev.orig/include/linux/ssb.h 2006-08-24 22:28:03.000000000
> +0200
> +++ wireless-dev/include/linux/ssb.h 2006-08-26 12:26:11.000000000 +0200
> @@ -251,6 +251,7 @@
> #define SSB_CC_MINI_MACPHY 0x823
> #define SSB_CC_ARM_1176 0x824
> #define SSB_CC_ARM_7TDMI 0x825
> +#define SSB_CC_CHIPCOMMON2 0x900
>
>
> /* ChipCommon core registers. */
>
>
--
Greetings Michael.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
