On 1/9/18 7:07 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> From: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com>
>
> Use block index in the messages instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com>
> ---
> net/sched/cls_api.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.c b/net/sched/cls_api.c
> index 9b45950..31e91dc 100644
> --- a/net/sched/cls_api.c
> +++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c
> @@ -672,8 +672,9 @@ int tcf_classify(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct
> tcf_proto *tp,
> #ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
> reset:
> if (unlikely(limit++ >= max_reclassify_loop)) {
> - net_notice_ratelimited("%s: reclassify loop, rule prio %u,
> protocol %02x\n",
> - tp->q->ops->id, tp->prio & 0xffff,
> + net_notice_ratelimited("%u: reclassify loop, rule prio %u,
> protocol %02x\n",
if you are dumping index instead of prio shouldn't the 'rule prio' above
be adjusted?
> + tp->chain->block->index,
> + tp->prio & 0xffff,
> ntohs(tp->protocol));
> return TC_ACT_SHOT;
> }
>
