Jouni Malinen wrote:

On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 01:45:34PM -0700, mabbas wrote:

This patch modify d80211 to add SIOCSIWRATE and SIOCGIWRATE
commands. this patch almost does the same thing as in PRISM2_HOSTAPD_SET_RATE_SETS.

I don't think I would like to get this applied since this seems to be
changing the design on how the per-STA TX rate limiting is done in a
way that does not match the original design and no justification has
been given for that change so far. Some comments below.
per-STA rate limiting is enforced by what the AP beacon supported rates values . this code is to enforce rate limiting for this interface regarding to any AP we join. looking at the code the overall rate restriction will be a combination of these two restrictions. this code is to implement for the below description in iwconfig man page.

rate/bit[rate]
For cards supporting multiple bit rates, set the bit-rate in b/s. The bit-rate is the speed at which bits are transmitted over the medium, the user speed of the link is lower due to medium
sharing and various overhead.
You may append the suffix k, M or G to the value (decimal multiplier : 10^3, 10^6 and 10^9 b/s), or add enough ق0ق. Values below 1000 are card specific, usually an index in the bit-rate list. Use auto to select automatic bit-rate mode (fallback to lower rate on noisy channels), which is the default for most cards, and fixed to revert back to fixed setting. If you specify a bit-rate value and append auto, the driver will use all bit-rates lower and equal than this value.
Examples :
iwconfig eth0 rate 11M
iwconfig eth0 rate auto
iwconfig eth0 rate 5.5M auto


--- a/net/d80211/ieee80211_i.h
@@ -280,6 +280,9 @@ #define IEEE80211_AUTH_ALG_LEAP BIT(2)
   struct sk_buff *probe_resp; /* ProbeResp template for IBSS */
   u32 supp_rates_bits;

+       u32 last_rate; /* last tx data rate value. management and multi cast 
frame
+                       * wont be used. */

Is this information valuable enough to collect with all the extra code
in ieee80211_tx_h_rate_ctrl()? The last rate can be fetched from the STA
entry. It won't be the exact same value as this one here, but then
again, I don't really see much point in reporting the last used TX rate
since it can be changing a lot. Some sort of average over the last N
frames could be more useful information to collect, if that level of
detail is needed.
The idea here is to report the last rate performed with this link once requested by iwconfig so the user can know the performance of the link. I can add some averaging but really the user want to see last value. I thought of using STA entry but in case IBSS mode there maybe many of them which once to report adding this entry will report last rate used by all of the station.


--- a/net/d80211/ieee80211_ioctl.c
+++ b/net/d80211/ieee80211_ioctl.c
@@ -2138,6 +2138,103 @@ static int ieee80211_ioctl_giwretry(stru
        return 0;
}

+static int ieee80211_ioctl_siwrate(struct net_device *dev,
+                                struct iw_request_info *info,
+                                union iwreq_data *wrqu, char *extra)
+{
+       struct ieee80211_local *local = dev->ieee80211_ptr;
+       int i, j;
+       u32 target_rate = wrqu->bitrate.value /100000;
+       u32 fixed;
+       int *old_supp = local->supp_rates[local->conf.phymode];
+       int *supp = NULL;
+
+       /* value = -1, fixed = 0 means auto only, so we should use
+        * all rates offered by AP
+        * value = X, fixed = 1 means only rate X
+       * value = X, fixed = 0 means all rates lower equal X */

Please keep in mind that this function can also be called in AP mode.
I can check for STA and IBSS only

+       fixed = wrqu->bitrate.fixed;
+       supp = (int *) kmalloc((local->num_curr_rates + 1) *
+                                       sizeof(int), GFP_KERNEL);
+       if (!supp)
+               return 0;

return -ENOMEM
I will change it to return -ENOMEM

+       j = 0;
+       for (i=0; i< local->num_curr_rates; i++) {
+               struct ieee80211_rate *rate = &local->curr_rates[i];
+
+               if (target_rate == rate->rate) {
+                       supp[j++] = rate->rate;
+                       break;
+               } else if (!fixed)
+                       supp[j++] = rate->rate;
+       }

This can allow number of invalid configurations; especially so, since
there is no synchronization with basic reate sets here. In addition, I
would not really want to change the supported/basic rate sets this way.
If there is desire to limit what rates the TX rate control algorithm is
using, this should be done by modifying per-STA entry data
(sta->supp_rates), not the per-radio rate table.
I am calling ieee80211_prepare_rates which will sync basic rate for us. again per-STA will be a problem for IBSS since I need to go to each station and apply this, and what about new added station I need to remember to apply this again, I think here is where it belong.

+       /* number of supported rate equal to all current supported rate
+        * this equal like supp_rates = NULL so save process time and set
+       * supp to NULL
+       */
+       if ((j >= local->num_curr_rates) || (j == 0)) {
+               kfree(supp);
+               supp = NULL;

Shouldn't these return an error and not replace the current rate
configuration?
if we reach here then we support all rates available at this point it is the same as setting supp_rates = null, this will be faster so we dont need to search supp _rates. if supp_rates is null then all rate supported. as this code in ieee80211_prepare_rates show

if (local->supp_rates[local->conf.phymode]) {
if (!rate_list_match(local->supp_rates
[local->conf.phymode],
rate->rate))
continue;
}

+       if (old_supp)
+               kfree(old_supp);

this pointer could be NULL

No need for 'if (old_supp)' before calling kfree(old_supp).

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to