From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Divides by zero are not nice, lets avoid them if possible.
Also do_div() seems not needed when dealing with 32bit operands,
but this seems a minor detail.
Fixes: bd4cf0ed331a ("net: filter: rework/optimize internal BPF interpreter's
instruction set")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Reported-by: syzbot <[email protected]>
---
kernel/bpf/core.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index
51ec2dda7f08c6c90af084589bb6d80662c77d12..7949e8b8f94e9cc196e0449214493
ccce61b0903 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -956,7 +956,7 @@ static unsigned int ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs,
const struct bpf_insn *insn,
DST = tmp;
CONT;
ALU_MOD_X:
- if (unlikely(SRC == 0))
+ if (unlikely((u32)SRC == 0))
return 0;
tmp = (u32) DST;
DST = do_div(tmp, (u32) SRC);
@@ -975,7 +975,7 @@ static unsigned int ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs,
const struct bpf_insn *insn,
DST = div64_u64(DST, SRC);
CONT;
ALU_DIV_X:
- if (unlikely(SRC == 0))
+ if (unlikely((u32)SRC == 0))
return 0;
tmp = (u32) DST;
do_div(tmp, (u32) SRC);