On 1/15/18 10:03 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 05:56:31PM CET, dsah...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On 1/12/18 8:46 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> From: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com>
>>>
>>> Add simple block get operation which primary purpose is to check the
>>> block existence by block index.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com>
>>> ---
>>> v6->v7:
>>> - new patch
>>> ---
>>> include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h | 6 ++++
>>> net/sched/cls_api.c | 64
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> security/selinux/nlmsgtab.c | 5 +++-
>>> 3 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h b/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h
>>> index da878f2..4b1f626 100644
>>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h
>>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h
>>> @@ -150,6 +150,12 @@ enum {
>>> RTM_NEWCACHEREPORT = 96,
>>> #define RTM_NEWCACHEREPORT RTM_NEWCACHEREPORT
>>>
>>> + RTM_NEWBLOCK = 100,
>>> +#define RTM_NEWBLOCK RTM_NEWBLOCK
>>> + RTM_DELBLOCK,
>>> +#define RTM_DELBLOCK RTM_DELBLOCK
>>> + RTM_GETBLOCK,
>>> +#define RTM_GETBLOCK RTM_GETBLOCK
>>> __RTM_MAX,
>>> #define RTM_MAX (((__RTM_MAX + 3) & ~3) - 1)
>>> };
>>> diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.c b/net/sched/cls_api.c
>>> index d687e58..14e4f20 100644
>>> --- a/net/sched/cls_api.c
>>> +++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c
>>> @@ -1553,6 +1553,69 @@ int tc_setup_cb_call(struct tcf_block *block, struct
>>> tcf_exts *exts,
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(tc_setup_cb_call);
>>>
>>> +static int block_notify_fill(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
>>> + struct tcf_block *block, u32 portid, u32 seq,
>>> + u16 flags, int event)
>>> +{
>>> + struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
>>> + struct tcmsg *tcm;
>>> +
>>> + nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, portid, seq, event, sizeof(*tcm), flags);
>>> + if (!nlh)
>>> + return -EMSGSIZE;
>>> + tcm = nlmsg_data(nlh);
>>> + memset(tcm, 0, sizeof(*tcm));
>>> + tcm->tcm_family = AF_UNSPEC;
>>> + tcm->tcm_ifindex = TCM_IFINDEX_MAGIC_BLOCK;
>>> + tcm->tcm_block_index = block->index;
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>
>> Why can't this be done with RTM_GETQDISC?
>
> I don't follow. Could you please describe a bit more what do you think?
Why are you adding RTM_{NEW,GET,DEL}BLOCK? Can't you get the same
information using RTM_GETQDISC and updating it to check for the
'tcm_ifindex == TCM_IFINDEX_MAGIC_BLOCK' path
