Hi Tariq
Very sad that the crash was reproduced again after applied the patch.
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c
@@ -252,6 +252,7 @@ static inline bool mlx4_en_is_ring_empty(struct
mlx4_en_rx_ring *ring)
static inline void mlx4_en_update_rx_prod_db(struct mlx4_en_rx_ring *ring)
{
+ dma_wmb();
*ring->wqres.db.db = cpu_to_be32(ring->prod & 0xffff);
}
I analyzed the kdump, it should be a memory corruption.
Thanks
Jianchao
On 01/15/2018 01:50 PM, jianchao.wang wrote:
> Hi Tariq
>
> Thanks for your kindly response.
>
> On 01/14/2018 05:47 PM, Tariq Toukan wrote:
>> Thanks Jianchao for your patch.
>>
>> And Thank you guys for your reviews, much appreciated.
>> I was off-work on Friday and Saturday.
>>
>> On 14/01/2018 4:40 AM, jianchao.wang wrote:
>>> Dear all
>>>
>>> Thanks for the kindly response and reviewing. That's really appreciated.
>>>
>>> On 01/13/2018 12:46 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>>>> Does this need to be dma_wmb(), and should it be in
>>>>> mlx4_en_update_rx_prod_db ?
>>>>>
>>>> +1 on dma_wmb()
>>>>
>>>> On what architecture bug was observed ?
>>> This issue was observed on x86-64.
>>> And I will send a new patch, in which replace wmb() with dma_wmb(), to
>>> customer
>>> to confirm.
>>
>> +1 on dma_wmb, let us know once customer confirms.
>> Please place it within mlx4_en_update_rx_prod_db as suggested.
> Yes, I have recommended it to customer.
> Once I get the result, I will share it here.
>> All other calls to mlx4_en_update_rx_prod_db are in control/slow path so I
>> prefer being on the safe side, and care less about bulking the barrier.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tariq
>>
>
