On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 07:37:50PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > From: Al Viro <[email protected]> > > another sock_do_ioctl() equivalent
Except for the additional data copy. Which might be worth mentioning in the changelog.
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] get rid of the use of set_fs() (by way ... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] get rid of the use of set_fs() (by way ... Al Viro
- [PATCH 01/10] net: separate SIOCGIFCONF handling fr... Al Viro
- [PATCH 07/10] lift handling of SIOCIW... out of... Al Viro
- [PATCH 02/10] devinet_ioctl(): take copyin/copy... Al Viro
- Re: [PATCH 02/10] devinet_ioctl(): take cop... Christoph Hellwig
- [PATCH 09/10] dev_ioctl(): move copyin/copyout ... Al Viro
- [PATCH 10/10] kill kernel_sock_ioctl() Al Viro
- [PATCH 05/10] kill bond_ioctl() Al Viro
- Re: [PATCH 05/10] kill bond_ioctl() Christoph Hellwig
- [PATCH 06/10] kill dev_ifname32() Al Viro
- [PATCH 08/10] ipconfig: use dev_set_mtu() Al Viro
- [PATCH 03/10] ip_rt_ioctl(): take copyin to cal... Al Viro
- Re: [PATCH 03/10] ip_rt_ioctl(): take copyi... Christoph Hellwig
- [PATCH 04/10] kill dev_ifsioc() Al Viro
- Re: [PATCH 04/10] kill dev_ifsioc() Christoph Hellwig
- Re: [PATCH 01/10] net: separate SIOCGIFCONF han... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] get rid of the use of set_fs() (by... Al Viro
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] get rid of the use of set_fs() (by... Al Viro
