On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 6:15 PM, Paweł Staszewski <pstaszew...@itcare.pl> wrote: > Hi
Hi Pawel > > Want to do some tests with xdp_router on two 100G physical interfaces but: > > Jan 29 17:00:40 HOST kernel: mlx5_core 0000:af:00.0: MLX5E: StrdRq(0) > RqSz(1024) StrdSz(1) RxCqeCmprss(0) > Jan 29 17:00:40 HOST kernel: mlx5_core 0000:af:00.0 enp175s0f0: Link up > Jan 29 17:00:41 HOST kernel: mlx5_core 0000:af:00.1: MLX5E: StrdRq(0) > RqSz(1024) StrdSz(1) RxCqeCmprss(0) > Jan 29 17:00:41 HOST kernel: mlx5_core 0000:af:00.1 enp175s0f1: Link up > Jan 29 17:00:41 HOST kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------ > Jan 29 17:00:41 HOST kernel: Driver unsupported XDP return value 4, expect > packet loss! Unfortunately, our driver do not support XDP_REDIRECT action yet, thus this warn is printed and packet is being dropped. We are developing it currently, expecting to send it in the next window of net-next. thanks, Eran > Jan 29 17:00:41 HOST kernel: WARNING: CPU: 43 PID: 0 at > net/core/filter.c:3901 bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action+0x34/0x40 > Jan 29 17:00:41 HOST kernel: Modules linked in: x86_pkg_temp_thermal ipmi_si > Jan 29 17:00:41 HOST kernel: CPU: 43 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/43 Not tainted > 4.15.0-rc9+ #1 > Jan 29 17:00:41 HOST kernel: RIP: 0010:bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action+0x34/0x40 > Jan 29 17:00:41 HOST kernel: RSP: 0018:ffff88087f9c3dc8 EFLAGS: 00010296
