On Sat, 3 Feb 2018 14:29:04 +0100
Christian Brauner <christian.brau...@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> +static int rtnl_ensure_unique_netns_attr(const struct sock *sk,
> + struct nlattr *tb[],
> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +{
> + int ret = -EINVAL;
> + struct net *net = NULL, *unique_net = NULL;
> +
> + /* Requests without network namespace ids have been able to specify
> + * multiple properties referring to different network namespaces so
> + * don't regress them.
> + */
> + if (!tb[IFLA_IF_NETNSID])
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (!tb[IFLA_NET_NS_PID] && !tb[IFLA_NET_NS_FD])
> + return 0;
Isn't this an error?
> +
> + unique_net = get_net_ns_by_id(sock_net(sk),
> nla_get_s32(tb[IFLA_IF_NETNSID]));
> + if (!unique_net)
> + return -1;
Other paths are returning errno, so why -1 here?
