On 1/26/2018 12:24, Pierre-Yves Kerbrat wrote:
Descriptor rings were not initialized at zero when allocated
When area contained garbage data, it caused skb_over_panic in
e1000_clean_rx_irq (if data had E1000_RXD_STAT_DD bit set)

This patch makes use of dma_zalloc_coherent to make sure the
ring is memset at 0 to prevent the area from containing garbage.

Following is the signature of the panic:
IODDR0@0.0: skbuff: skb_over_panic: text:80407b20 len:64010 put:64010 
head:ab46d800 data:ab46d842 tail:0xab47d24c end:0xab46df40 dev:eth0
IODDR0@0.0: BUG: failure at net/core/skbuff.c:105/skb_panic()!
IODDR0@0.0: Kernel panic - not syncing: BUG!
IODDR0@0.0: Process swapper/0 (pid: 0, threadinfo=81728000, task=8173cc00 ,cpu: 
IODDR0@0.0: SP = <815a1c0c>
IODDR0@0.0: Stack:      00000001
IODDR0@0.0: b2d89800 815e33ac
IODDR0@0.0: ea73c040 00000001
IODDR0@0.0: 60040003 0000fa0a
IODDR0@0.0: 00000002
IODDR0@0.0: 804540c0 815a1c70
IODDR0@0.0: b2744000 602ac070
IODDR0@0.0: 815a1c44 b2d89800
IODDR0@0.0: 8173cc00 815a1c08
IODDR0@0.0:     00000006
IODDR0@0.0: 815a1b50 00000000
IODDR0@0.0: 80079434 00000001
IODDR0@0.0: ab46df40 b2744000
IODDR0@0.0: b2d89800
IODDR0@0.0: 0000fa0a 8045745c
IODDR0@0.0: 815a1c88 0000fa0a
IODDR0@0.0: 80407b20 b2789f80
IODDR0@0.0: 00000005 80407b20
IODDR0@0.0: Call Trace:
IODDR0@0.0: [<804540bc>] skb_panic+0xa4/0xa8
IODDR0@0.0: [<80079430>] console_unlock+0x2f8/0x6d0
IODDR0@0.0: [<80457458>] skb_put+0xa0/0xc0
IODDR0@0.0: [<80407b1c>] e1000_clean_rx_irq+0x2dc/0x3e8
IODDR0@0.0: [<80407b1c>] e1000_clean_rx_irq+0x2dc/0x3e8
IODDR0@0.0: [<804079c8>] e1000_clean_rx_irq+0x188/0x3e8
IODDR0@0.0: [<80407b1c>] e1000_clean_rx_irq+0x2dc/0x3e8
IODDR0@0.0: [<80468b48>] __dev_kfree_skb_any+0x88/0xa8
IODDR0@0.0: [<804101ac>] e1000e_poll+0x94/0x288
IODDR0@0.0: [<8046e9d4>] net_rx_action+0x19c/0x4e8
IODDR0@0.0:   ...
IODDR0@0.0: Maximum depth to print reached. Use kstack=<maximum_depth_to_print> 
To specify a custom value (where 0 means to display the full backtrace)
IODDR0@0.0: ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: BUG!

Signed-off-by: Pierre-Yves Kerbrat <pkerb...@kalray.eu>
Signed-off-by: Marius Gligor <mgli...@kalray.eu>
  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c 
index 1298b69..26121ed 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
@@ -2333,7 +2333,7 @@ static int e1000_alloc_ring_dma(struct e1000_adapter 
        struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
- ring->desc = dma_alloc_coherent(&pdev->dev, ring->size, &ring->dma,
+       ring->desc = dma_zalloc_coherent(&pdev->dev, ring->size, &ring->dma,
        if (!ring->desc)
                return -ENOMEM;

Looks good. Prefer get another opinion from somebody else.

Reply via email to