On Sun, 2018-02-11 at 14:26 -0800, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
> From: Roopa Prabhu <ro...@cumulusnetworks.com>
> 
> Add support to match on src port, dst port and ip protocol.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roopa Prabhu <ro...@cumulusnetworks.com>
> ---
>  include/uapi/linux/fib_rules.h |  3 +++
>  net/ipv4/fib_rules.c           | 46 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/fib_rules.h b/include/uapi/linux/fib_rules.h
> index 2b642bf..79ff3c2 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/fib_rules.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/fib_rules.h
> @@ -58,6 +58,9 @@ enum {
>       FRA_PAD,
>       FRA_L3MDEV,     /* iif or oif is l3mdev goto its table */
>       FRA_UID_RANGE,  /* UID range */
> +     FRA_PROTO,      /* ip proto */
> +     FRA_SPORT,      /* sport */
> +     FRA_DPORT,      /* dport */
>       __FRA_MAX
>  };
>  
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_rules.c b/net/ipv4/fib_rules.c
> index 35d646a..f204c85 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/fib_rules.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/fib_rules.c
> @@ -45,13 +45,17 @@ struct fib4_rule {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_CLASSID
>       u32                     tclassid;
>  #endif
> +     __be16                  sport;
> +     __be16                  dport;
> +     u8                      proto;
>  };
>  
>  static bool fib4_rule_matchall(const struct fib_rule *rule)
>  {
>       struct fib4_rule *r = container_of(rule, struct fib4_rule, common);
>  
> -     if (r->dst_len || r->src_len || r->tos)
> +     if (r->dst_len || r->src_len || r->tos || r->proto || r->sport ||
> +         r->dport)
>               return false;
>       return fib_rule_matchall(rule);
>  }
> @@ -182,6 +186,15 @@ static int fib4_rule_match(struct fib_rule *rule, struct 
> flowi *fl, int flags)
>       if (r->tos && (r->tos != fl4->flowi4_tos))
>               return 0;
>  
> +     if (r->proto && (r->proto != fl4->flowi4_proto))
> +             return 0;
> +
> +     if (r->sport && (r->sport != fl4->fl4_sport))
> +             return 0;
> +
> +     if (r->dport && (r->dport != fl4->fl4_dport))
> +             return 0;
> +

Any setup with about 20 rules to be evaluated (per packet cost) will
feel the pain...

I wonder if we could JIT/eBPF this thing.


Reply via email to