On (02/13/18 12:04), David Miller wrote:
> 
> Let's not over-engineer this.  For one thing, whatever allocation bits
> came down from the callers, we are going to lose here.

Ok, I was wondering how much of the sk_allocation we want to keep in
the future, so I did this admittedly weird thing. I'll change it
to the obvious and submit v3.

--Sowmini

Reply via email to