Hi Eric,
On 02/14/2018 12:43 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 15:33 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> From: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>
>>
>> In case user program provides silly parameters, we want
>> a map_alloc() handler to return an error, not a NULL pointer,
>> otherwise we crash later in find_and_alloc_map()
>>
>> Fixes: 174a79ff9515 ("bpf: sockmap with sk redirect support")
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>
>> Reported-by: syzbot <syzkal...@googlegroups.com>
>> ---
>
> This would apply to net or bpf trees, not -next ones, sorry for the
> confusion in the [PATCH bpf-next] prefix.
No problem, thanks for the fix!
> Bug was added in 4.14
Fixes tag is actually slightly different, it would be:
Fixes: 1aa12bdf1bfb ("bpf: sockmap, add sock close() hook to remove socks")
I can change it if you want, no need to resend.
Thanks,
Daniel
