Dmitry Vyukov <dvyu...@google.com> writes: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 9:26 AM, Paolo Abeni <pab...@redhat.com> wrote: >> On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 16:47 -0500, David Miller wrote: >>> I have to mention this now before it gets out of control. >>> >>> I would like to ask that syzkaller stop posting the patch it is >>> testing when it posts to netdev. >> >> There is an open issue on this topic: >> >> https://github.com/google/syzkaller/issues/526 >> >> The current behaviour is that syzbot replies to all get_maintainer.pl >> recipients after testing a patch, regardless of the test submission >> recipient list, the idea was instead to respect such list. > > > Hi David, Florian, Paolo, > > Didn't realize it triggers patchwork. This wasn't intentional, sorry.
A little-publicised and incorrectly-documented(!) feature of Patchwork is that it supports some email headers. In particular, if you include an "X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore" header, the mail will not be parsed by Patchwork. This will stop it being recorded as a patch. Unfortunately it will also stop it being recorded as a comment - I don't know if that's an issue in this case. Maybe we can set you up with Patchwork 2's new checks infrastructure instead. > > Do I understand it correctly that if syzbot replies to the CC list > that was in the testing request, it will resolve the problem? So if > netdev wasn't in CC, it will not be added to CC. > > I will go and fix it now.
