On 07/03/18 15:24, David Miller wrote:
> Ok.
> Since nobody is really working on the ethtool --> devlink/netlink conversion,
> it really isn't reasonable for me to block useful changes like your's.
> So please resubmit this series and I will apply it.
> Thanks.
Ok, thanks.  Should I stick with the hackish union-and-flag-bit, or define a
 new ethtool command number for the extended command?

Reply via email to