On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 9:37 AM, Richard Cochran
<richardcoch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 09:35:24AM -0800, Richard Cochran wrote:
>> The discussion on v2 ended with this per-message idea, in preference
>> to the per-socket idea, IIRC.
> (But my own opinion is that per-socket is good enough...)
> Thanks,
> Richard

I would love if skb->tstamp could be either 0 or expressed in
ktime_get() base all the time.

( Even if we would have to convert this to other bases when/if needed)

Having to deal with many clockid in the core networking stack seems
over engineered.

Reply via email to