On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 9:37 AM, Richard Cochran <richardcoch...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 09:35:24AM -0800, Richard Cochran wrote: >> The discussion on v2 ended with this per-message idea, in preference >> to the per-socket idea, IIRC. > > (But my own opinion is that per-socket is good enough...) > > Thanks, > Richard
I would love if skb->tstamp could be either 0 or expressed in ktime_get() base all the time. ( Even if we would have to convert this to other bases when/if needed) Having to deal with many clockid in the core networking stack seems over engineered.
