From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]> Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2018 15:31:15 +0000
> Eschewing a 15% speedup on the basis that "well, even though we've had > three of these already for a decade, we're worried that adding a fourth > might open the floodgates to further patches" does seem a little odd to > me, FWIW. The cost we are dealing with is a fundamental one which is a result of the hook design. Indirect calls are killer. Indirect calls are even more killer now in the age of Spectre and retpolines. I definitely would rather see the fundamental issue addressed rather than poking at it randomly with knobs for this case and that. Thank you.
