On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 07:06:00AM -0700, David Miller wrote:

> Any ordering scheme is wrong or unexpected for _somebody_.  Look how

I agree violently. Would you agree that it would be best to have a mechanism
that explicitly sets a sane default, and does not rely on ordering?

My implementation indeed broke your intentions, but would you be open to
revamping things so the default policy is not dependent on load order?

What would the desired default be, 'BIC' in all cases?

Thanks. 

-- 
http://www.PowerDNS.com      Open source, database driven DNS Software 
http://netherlabs.nl              Open and Closed source services
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to