> Am 09.04.2018 um 11:25 schrieb Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net>: > > On 04/09/2018 11:21 AM, Markus Heiser wrote: > [...] >> Do we really need another kernel-doc parser? >> >> ./scripts/kernel-doc include/uapi/linux/bpf.h >> >> should already do the job (producing .rst). For more infos, take a look at > > This has absolutely zero to do with kernel-doc, but rather producing > a description of BPF helper function that are later assembled into an > actual man-page that BPF program developers (user space) can use.
May I completely misunderstood you, so correct my if I'am wrong: - ./scripts/bpf_helpers_doc.py : produces reST markup from C-comments - ./scripts/kerne-doc : produces reST markup from C-comments IMO: both are doing the same job, so why not using kernel-doc? -- Markus --
