On 4/14/18 3:11 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 01:42:14PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On 4/13/18 11:19 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 02:28:04PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
we can replace it with
or some other name,
I would prefer the BPF specific hack; otherwise we might be encouraging
people to build the kernel proper without asm-goto.
I don't understand this concern.
The thing is; this will be a (temporary) BPF specific hack. Hiding it
behind something that looks 'normal' (CC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO) is just not
This is a fair concern. I will use a different macro and send v2 soon.