On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 04:08:36PM +0200, Sebastiano Miano wrote: > > That's in fact the real use case for the first two patches. Since bpf > tracepoints are still a rather common (and easy to use) troubleshooting and > monitoring tool why shouldn't we "enhance" their support with the newly > added map/prog IDs?
because these tracepoints can be abused in the way that this patch demonstrated. Whether to keep this patch in the series or not is irrelevant.
