From: Jacob Keller <[email protected]> The pfc related priority stats are already handled separately as these stats are actually arrays of length I40E_MAX_USER_PRIORITY. Thus, including them within i40e_gstrings_stats will just duplicate data.
Worse, the sizeof will be incorrect, as it will be the total size of the stat arrays, which in this case is 8 * sizeof(u64), so we will only copy the stat contents as if they were a u32. Since we already correctly handle these stats else where, remove them from the i40e_gstrings_stats. Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <[email protected]> Tested-by: Andrew Bowers <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <[email protected]> --- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.c index a62142f033d2..0f237397f52b 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.c @@ -103,10 +103,6 @@ static const struct i40e_stats i40e_gstrings_stats[] = { I40E_PF_STAT("link_xoff_rx", stats.link_xoff_rx), I40E_PF_STAT("link_xon_tx", stats.link_xon_tx), I40E_PF_STAT("link_xoff_tx", stats.link_xoff_tx), - I40E_PF_STAT("priority_xon_rx", stats.priority_xon_rx), - I40E_PF_STAT("priority_xoff_rx", stats.priority_xoff_rx), - I40E_PF_STAT("priority_xon_tx", stats.priority_xon_tx), - I40E_PF_STAT("priority_xoff_tx", stats.priority_xoff_tx), I40E_PF_STAT("rx_size_64", stats.rx_size_64), I40E_PF_STAT("rx_size_127", stats.rx_size_127), I40E_PF_STAT("rx_size_255", stats.rx_size_255), -- 2.17.0
